The mean RQS score of all studies was 14.2% (ranging from 0.0 to 40.3%), and 23 studies (51.1%) were given a score of less then 10%. Conclusion The radiomics features could serve as diagnostic and prognostic indicators in lymphoma. However, the current conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the suboptimal quality of the studies. In order to introduce radiomics into lymphoma clinical settings, the lesion segmentation and selection, the influence of the pathological pattern and the extraction of multiple modalities and multiple time points features need to be further studied. Key points • The radiomics approach may provide useful information for diagnosis, prediction of the therapy response, and outcome of lymphoma. • The quality of published radiomics studies in lymphoma has been suboptimal to date. • More studies are needed to examine lesion selection and segmentation, the influence of pathological patterns, and the extraction of multiple modalities and multiple time point features.Objectives Feature tracking for assessing myocardial strain from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images detects myocardial deformation abnormalities with prognostic implication, e.g., in myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy. Standards for image acquisition and processing are not yet available. Study aim was analyzing the influence of spatial resolution and contrast agent on myocardial strain results. Methods Seventy-five patients underwent CMR for analyzing peak systolic circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strain. Group A included n = 50 with normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no wall motion abnormality, and no fibrosis on late enhancement imaging. Group B included n = 25 with chronic myocardial infarct. For feature tracking, steady-state free precession cine images were acquired repeatedly. (1) Native standard cine (spatial resolution 1.4 × 1.4 × 8 mm3). (2) Native cine with lower spatial resolution (2.0 × 2.0 × 8 mm3). (3) Cine equal to variant 1 acquired after administration of gadostudy demonstrated that CMR strain results may be influenced by spatial resolution and by the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent. • The results underline the need for standardized image acquisition for CMR strain analysis, with constant imaging parameters and without contrast agent.Background Inappropriate ventilator assist plays an important role in the development of diaphragm dysfunction. Ventilator under-assist may lead to muscle injury, while over-assist may result in muscle atrophy. This provides a good rationale to monitor respiratory drive in ventilated patients. Respiratory drive can be monitored by a nasogastric catheter, either with esophageal balloon to determine muscular pressure (gold standard) or with electrodes to measure electrical activity of the diaphragm. A disadvantage is that both techniques are invasive. NDI091143 Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the role of surrogate markers for respiratory dive, such as extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscle activity. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of different inspiratory support levels on the recruitment pattern of extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscles with respect to the diaphragm and to evaluate agreement between activity of extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscles and the diaphragm. Methods Activibility. Onset of alae nasi activity preceded the onset of all other muscles. Conclusions Extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscle activity increases in response to lower inspiratory support levels. However, there is a poor correlation and agreement with the change in diaphragm activity, limiting the use of surface electromyography (EMG) recordings of extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscles as a surrogate for electrical activity of the diaphragm.Background In laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, the hepatic left lateral segment often obstructs the operative field of view, especially around the esophageal hiatus. Therefore, a safe retraction method is needed. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of inverting the hepatic left lateral segment in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Methods This was a retrospective review of 81 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Patients were divided into two groups, i.e., the Nathanson liver retractor group (n = 41) and hepatic left lateral segment inverting group (n = 40). The unedited video recordings of the procedures and the patients' medical records were reviewed and compared. Results The hepatic left lateral segment inverting method provided a more satisfactory view of the operative fields and a wider working space around the esophageal hiatus than the Nathanson liver retractor. No intraoperative hepatic congestion and significantly improved postoperative liver enzyme elevations were observed with hepatic left lateral segment inverting method compared with the Nathanson liver retractor method. Conclusions In laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, the hepatic left lateral segment inverting method appears to provide improvements in both the operative field of view and liver protection compared with the Nathanson liver retractor method.Background Anatomical segmentectomy is a technically challenging procedure because tertiary portal pedicles are multiple, variable, and deep inside the liver.1 Anatomical segmentectomy can be performed using the transfissural Glissonean approach through the opening main portal fissure or umbilical fissure.1-3 We present laparoscopic anatomical resection of segment 4b using the transfissural Glissonean approach. Methods A 67-year-old man was referred for treatment of single nodular mass in segment 4b. The surgical procedure involved the following steps (1) Opening of the umbilical fissure along the umbilical fissure vein (2) Dissection of Glissonean pedicle 4b (3) Identification of ischemic territory of segment 4b (4) Right-side parenchymal transection along the ischemic line. Results The operative time was 230 min, and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The final histopathological diagnosis was hepatocellular carcinoma. The tumor size was 30 mm and the resection margin was 25 mm. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery, and he was discharged on postoperative day 6.