Label-free Raman-based imaging techniques create the possibility of bringing chemical and histologic data into the operation room. Relying on the intrinsic biochemical properties of tissues to generate image contrast and optical tissue sectioning, Raman-based imaging methods can be used to detect microscopic tumor infiltration and diagnose brain tumor subtypes. Here, we review the application of three Raman-based imaging methods to neurosurgical oncology Raman spectroscopy, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy, and stimulated Raman histology (SRH). Raman spectroscopy allows for chemical characterization of tissue and can differentiate normal and tumor-infiltrated tissue based on variations in macromolecule content, both ex vivo and in vivo. Selleck Deoxycytidine To improve signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional Raman spectroscopy, a second pulsed excitation laser can be used to coherently drive the vibrational frequency of specific Raman active chemical bonds (i.e. symmetric stretching of -CH bonnfiltration, guiding tumor biopsy/resection, and providing images for histopathologic and molecular diagnosis. Despite recent advances in treatment for a number of cancers with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), immunotherapy has had limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). The recent multi-centered CheckMate 143 trial in first time recurrent GBM and the Checkmate 498 trial in newly diagnosed unmethylated GBM showed that antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) failed to improve overall survival in patients with GBM. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have explored combining ICB with several other therapies including additional ICB against alternative checkpoint molecules, activation of costimulatory checkpoint molecules such as 4-1BB, radiation-induced tumor cell lysis and immunogenic recruitment, local chemotherapy, neoadjuvant ICB therapy, and myeloid cell reactivation. We have reviewed the literature on ICB seminal to the progression of several preclinical studies and clinical trials in order to provide a compendium of the current state of combination immunotherapy for GBM. For ongoing clinn was observed in multiple different combination strategies for GBM in both preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that ICB combination therapy results in a significant immunological impact on the tumor microenvironment.Despite the lack of clinical survival benefit, immune modulation was observed in multiple different combination strategies for GBM in both preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that ICB combination therapy results in a significant immunological impact on the tumor microenvironment. Most clinical trials in neurooncology are led by investigators primarily trained in neurology or medical oncology. While neurosurgeons are trained to be problem-solvers and innovators, research training has historically been focused on laboratory-based discovery approaches and formalized training in prospective clinical trials research is not part of routine graduate training. We reviewed literature that demonstrates that innovation and problem-solving are integral to the practice of neurosurgery cite multiple examples of advances in technique and technology that may have had an empirical origin but that led to prospective clinical trials resulting in change in practice. Neurosurgeons have developed and led both traditional (clinical outcome-oriented) and translational prospective clinical trials that have evaluated the best use of currently available therapeutics or tested the ability of novel therapeutics to alter the biology and/or course of disease. In this review, we focus on a number of the recently developed technologies and therapeutics that were evaluated in clinical trials led or co-led by neurosurgeons. We also highlight some of the barriers that need to be addressed in order to foster neurosurgical participation and leadership in the prospective development of novel therapeutics.In this review, we focus on a number of the recently developed technologies and therapeutics that were evaluated in clinical trials led or co-led by neurosurgeons. We also highlight some of the barriers that need to be addressed in order to foster neurosurgical participation and leadership in the prospective development of novel therapeutics. Evidence-based medicine guidelines are increasingly published and sanctioned by organized neurosurgery. However, implementation, interpretation, and use of clinical guidelines may vary substantially on a regional, national and international basis. Survey research can help bridge the gap by providing a snapshot of neurosurgeon attitudes, knowledge, and practices. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) Section on Tumors formed a Survey Committee to formalize the process by which surveys are submitted and reviewed before distribution to our membership. The goal of this committee is to provide peer-review so that collected information will be scientifically robust and useful to the neurosurgical community. Surveys submitted to the AANS/CNS tumor section between 2015 and 2019 were reviewed and metrics such as response rate and publication status assessed. Six surveys were submitted to the Survey Committee of the AANS/CNS section on tumors between 2015 and 2019. Four have been circulated to section members, of which three have been published. Response rate has averaged 19% (range 16-23%), a majority of respondents (mean 70%) practice in academic settings. The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors Survey Committee has and continues to help promote and improve the practice of surveying our community to answer important questions that can advance future training, research, and practice. There remains significant room for improvement in response rates, but ongoing tumor section efforts to increase member engagement will likely improve these numbers.The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors Survey Committee has and continues to help promote and improve the practice of surveying our community to answer important questions that can advance future training, research, and practice. There remains significant room for improvement in response rates, but ongoing tumor section efforts to increase member engagement will likely improve these numbers.