The identification of lost movement choices revealed during the assessment of movement coordination strategies is proposed as a marker of movement health. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The health of the movement system may be informed by the ability to display choice in movement coordination strategies. There is evidence that restoring these choices has clinical utility and an influence on pain and improved function. This approach seeks to provide individuals with more flexible problem solving, enabled through a movement system that is robust to each unique challenge of function. This assessment framework sits within a bigger clinical reasoning picture for sustained quality of life. STUDY DESIGN A secondary analysis of a systematic review. BACKGROUND Manipulations or mobilizations are commonly used interventions in patients with mechanical neck pain. The treatment effects have often been studied in randomized controlled trials (RCT) which are generally considered the gold standard in evaluating the treatment effects, mainly due to its high internal validity. External validity is defined as the extent to which the effects can be generalised to clinical practice. An important prerequisite for this is that interventions used in clinical trials can be replicated in clinical practice. It can be questioned if interventions utilized in randomized controlled trials can be translated into clinical practice. OBJECTIVES The overall aim of this study is to examine whether the quality of the description of manipulation and mobilization interventions is sufficient for to replication of these interventions in clinical practice. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed. Two independent researchers used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) which is a 12-item checklist for describing the completeness of the interventions. RESULTS Sixty-seven articles were included that used manipulation and/or mobilization interventions for patients with mechanical neck pain. None of the articles describe the intervention e.g. all the items on the TIDieR list. Considering item 8 (a-f) of the TIDieR checklist only one article described the used techniques completely. CONCLUSION Manipulation or a mobilization interventions are poorly reported in RCTs, which jeopardize the external validity of RCTs, making it difficult for clinicians and researchers to replicate these interventions. OBJECTIVES To compare diagnostic ability of the clinical cervical movement sense (CCMS) test to the neck virtual reality (VR) system accuracy module. BACKGROUND Altered cervical proprioception is common in patients with persistent neck pain (NP). Recently a simple CCMS has been found to be feasible and reliable. learn more However, it is not known how this compares to a valid method. METHODS Twenty participants with persistent NP and 20 healthy controls were videoed while performing the CCMS using a laser pointer and traced a zigzag pattern and then assessed using the VR accuracy module which consisted of following 8 segments in four directions. Diagnostic ability using a model from potential variables from the video analysis of number of errors and task performance time was compared to a model provided from VR data. RESULTS Subjects with NP had significantly greater horizontal errors in the CCMS and VR accuracy. Both CCMS and VR measurement models utilising measurements of horizontal movement error demonstrated good diagnostic ability (AUC = 0.88, 0.91 respectively) and there was no statistical difference between the models' AUC (p = 0.7). CONCLUSION The simple clinical testing tool appears to provide a measure of cervical movement sense, similar to the established Neck VR accuracy measure. Both tools differentiated individuals with NP from controls with similar sensitivity and specificity, with some advantage to the VR. The rotational motion measures seem most suitable in the assessment of motion accuracy. CCMS has potential to be used as a simple clinical measure and warrants further research. BACKGROUND and purpose This study aimed to determine the effect of music therapy on pain, anxiety, and patient comfort during colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a randomized, controlled, intervention study, which included 112 patients that underwent colonoscopy. The patients were randomized into the intervention group (n = 56) that was given 30-minute music therapy during the colonoscopy and the control group (n = 56) without any intervention other than routine nursing care. The data were collected using an information and observation form, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS The pain and anxiety scores were lower in the intervention group whereas comfort score was higher than control group (p  less then  0.05). The pain and anxiety levels of the patients in the intervention group decreased after the colonoscopy and their comfort levels increased. CONCLUSIONS The music therapy reduced pain and anxiety, increased comfort during colonoscopy. Esophageal cancer is a major public health issue in China. Mongolian Mind-Body Interactive Psychotherapy (MMIP) is a new psychotherapy that combines modern psychology with traditional Mongolian medicine. Previous cases have shown better quality of life (QoL) after MMIP in patients with cancer and other diseases. This study aimed to shed light on the effect of MMIP on the quality of life of patients in Inner Mongolia. A total of 21 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer were studied. QoL assessment was performed using the two questionnaires of EORTC QLQ-OES 18 and QLICP-OES. The results showed that MMIP had statistical significant improvement on body function, psychological function, common symptoms, and side effects, such as reflux. As alternative and complementary medicine, MMIP could help esophageal cancer patients experience better QoL. Further large-scale studies are required to determine the impact of MMIP for QoL in patients undergoing surgery or chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the effect of pranayama on asthma control, pulmonary function, and quality of life in people with asthma. METHODS Pranayama was applied to the pranayama group for 20 min once daily for 1 month, and relaxation was applied to the relaxation group similarly in addition to the standard treatment. The outcome measurement tools used were the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), pulmonary function test (PFT), and patient observation chart. RESULTS The pranayama group had significantly higher ACT score, overall AQLQ score, and subscale scores than the relaxation group (p  0.05). CONCLUSION Pranayama improved asthma control and asthma-related quality of life in people with asthma, but it did not show a significant difference in PFT values.